Monday, October 24, 2011

Should residents in your town/city/area be legally allowed to own a tiger or "other large and dangerous" animals?

7 comments:

K8 said...

c-c-c-razy. no.

erin said...

No. Those poor animals in Ohio.

Scottie said...

I'd have to say no, with the corollary that idiots who think they can actually control wild animals and raise them as pets deserve to become statistics and Darwin Award winners.

Dan said...

Fuck no!

Cate said...

I don't think residents should be able to own large and dangerous animals as pets, but I have no problem with trained veterinary professionals opening up a reserve for retired circus animals and the like.

Hailey Snow said...

No because only crazies own them.

Sean said...

If my "area" means Capitol Hill, then YES.